A conservative columnist for the Boston Globe, Jeff Jacoby, got it right (for a change), when he
said, “Perhaps by then [a generation or two down the road] the very idea of
race -- white, black or anything else -- will finally have been discarded, and American
children will marvel at the idea that color of skin or shape of eye could ever
have mattered so much to their forbears.” (“When
‘white’ is a trick of definition,” Boston
Globe, K9.)
Only 45 years ago, when I was twenty-seven years old, lawyers defended a
Virginia law that banned
“interracial marriage” on the grounds that the law prevented pollution of the
“white race.” The U.S. Supreme Court, in a landmark decision (Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 [1967])
overturned the Virginia law, and
since then no laws banning “interracial” marriage could be enforced in the U.S.
Those laws banning “interracial” marriages, which several
states still had in 1967, relied on a concept of “race” that has no scientific
basis. Ashley Montagu pointed this out in his book, Man’s Most Dangerous Myth: The Fallacy of Race, first published in
1942, 25 years before the decision in Loving
v. Virginia. As I pointed out in How
We Are Our Enemy -- And How to Stop, “ ‘Race’ is a mythical
creation of the human imagination, having no basis in biology. There is no
‘race’ gene. It is long past the time when the concept of ‘race’ should be
totally extinguished from our way of thinking” (p.136).
Yet, science is continually ignored when we talk about
“mixed race” couples, etc. There is no such thing. If you mix nothing with
nothing, you get nothing.
It is still necessary, of course, to recognize racism and
the reality of different ethnicities and cultural groupings. These are
observable phenomena. “Race” is not observable. It is a concept inferred from
observation -- and a concept that
observation and genetics do not support now and never did.
In my rare support of Mr. Jacoby, I wrote a letter to the
editor, which the Boston Globe
published today (6/3/2012 ),
with minor modifications, in its “Opinion” section. Here is the letter as
published (the misleading title is the Globe's):
Time at last for us
to become post-racial
Jeff Jacoby effectively makes a case for getting rid of
the very idea of “race” (“When
‘white’ is a trick of definition,” Op-ed, May 27). I fully agree. Not only
is “white” a trick of definition. So are all of the other terms used to
designate race. But for these tricks, President Obama, given his biological
parents, is as much “white” as he is “black.” Yet we try to fit him and
everyone else into so-called racial categories that make no sense.
“Race” exists only as a mythical idea created centuries ago
by people who wanted to affirm the superiority of those who looked like them.
It is past time to get rid of this false idea.
Whenever we use the term “race,” we should put it in
quotation marks as a way of recognizing and affirming that it is primarily an
idea that exists to support racism.
John L. Hodge
Jamaica Plain
No comments:
Post a Comment